I went to see the LCCM house.

LCCM stands for Life Cycle Carbon Minus, and aims to reduce CO2 emissions as much as possible from the manufacturing to the demolition of a house.
By increasing the power output and installing a large amount of solar power generation, the existence of the building will have a negative impact on the environment in the next 20 years.
The energy generated by solar power generation etc. is greater than the CO2 emitted from the time of construction to use.
As you can see from the word "carbon minus," the existence of such a house reduces CO2 emissions.
On the contrary, it will decrease.
The latest issue of the magazine also featured a 20-page feature on the topic.
This combination was created by a certain architectural research institute, with Masao Koizumi as the head of the design department.
It was a building built by a leading figure in the thermal environment in Japan, and when I saw the passive house in Germany,
I didn't get any shock from it. It's not that it's good or bad.
But how can we build a house like that in a normal way? Of course, it doesn't have to be exactly like that, but we can still get the essence of it.
Even just using it seems impossible. It's interesting as a special solution for a model house.
I think it is an attempt. However, as someone who actually designs many houses, I think that all of them
You want to get something that will help improve your home.
When I saw the passive houses in Germany, there were so many of them that it was almost abnormal.
I was very impressed. But this time, I hardly felt that way.
I had imagined that this would be the case, but there were still many things I couldn't understand until I went there.
I think it was a good thing in that regard.